The ethical dilemma of deathbed wishes(2)（每日一篇・聆聽）

日期：2025.6.2

文章級別：聆聽

＊＊＊＊＊

這是昨天的延伸。今天選的ＴＥＤ探討的是......如果對方已經去世了呢？答應了別人臨終的願望，是不是就要守一輩子呢？大家一齊來聽聽～

指引：先按以上的連結指定的錄音內容，今天我們會聆聽1分18秒至2分43秒，你也可以提早開始聽聽，熱身一下～做聆聽練習的時候，不要開字幕，邊看下面的文字，一邊在紙上寫上答案，看看內容播完後自己答對了多少題。有需要的話可以調慢錄音的語速或多聽幾次～

1"18

Philosophy has a lot to say about the value of keeping promises.

For example, philosopher Tim Scanlon argues that promising is essentially about creating (1)_____ expectations. Making a promise assures another person that we'll act in a certain way which they can incorporate into their plans. But since Yvonne can no longer make plans, it seems like Zaina's (2)_____ only affects herself, right?

Maybe not. Philosophers like John Rawls and David Hume argue that keeping promises isn't as much about protecting the individuals involved as preserving the (3)_____ of promising itself. Hume sees promises as tools for signaling trustworthiness, so breaking them makes the practice less (4)_____ overall. Similarly, Rawls thinks keeping promises is a matter of fairness. If you've benefited from this social practice, then justice requires you to (5)_____ your end of the bargain.

But do these social concerns apply to promises we've made to (6)_____? And even if they do, shouldn't Zaina's decision on this personal matter focus more on Yvonne than on what Zaina might abstractly owe (7)_____? These questions don't have clear answers, and they might not even be relevant to this case.

Most philosophers agree that promises obtained through (8)_____ or (9)_____ aren't binding. And one could argue that Zaina's promises were made under duress. Who could say "no" to their dying spouse?

2"43

＊＊＊＊＊

答案

1. interpersonal
2. decision
3. societal value
4. reliable
5. uphold
6. the dead
7. society
8. coercion
9. deceit

答對多少了呢？留言告訴我吧！♡