It is about time that the Supreme Court of Colorado ruled on a "slip opinion" Case No. 23SA300 on December 19, 2023, referring to former US President Trump, potentially being on the ballot of the Republican presidential primary.
The slip opinion ruled, "To maintain the status quo pending any review by the U.S. Supreme Court, we stay our ruling until January 4, 2024 (the day before the Secretary’s deadline to certify the content of the presidential primary ballot). If a review is sought in the Supreme Court before the stay expires on January 4, 2024, then the stay shall remain in place, and the Secretary will continue to be required to include President Trump’s name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot until the receipt of any order or mandate from the Supreme Court."
The time is up, and the Supreme Court agrees to decide whether Trump can be barred from office, according to CNN. It is a rare case: a judicial decision to "intervene" legally in a highly political situation, especially considering that Trump holds the top support in the Republican camp.
Here is my scenario to solve this Deadlock days after the slip opinon: To defend the US Constitution, it is reasonable for the US Federal Supreme Court to rule that Trump should not be on the ballot of the Republican primary election, just as the Colorado Supreme Court did. Meanwhile, to respond and counter the imbalance across-branches predicament, it is proper to end the show with Biden's declaration not to participate in the 2024 Democratic primary election.
It is not a fantasy because Biden did expressed "If Trump wasn't running, I'm not sure I'd be running," at a fundraising event for his 2024 campaign outside of Boston. "We cannot let him win," on last December 5.
It is a political resolution for both sides to resolve the cross-branches stalemate. Two senior politicians should retire simultaneously for the sake of the US Constitution and national interests.
科羅拉多最高法院2023年12月19日針對編號23SA300案件的「臨時意見」裁定，提到前美國總統川普是否能列在共和黨總統初選的選票上。
這項臨時意見裁定「為了在美國聯邦最高法院進行任何審查前能保持現狀，我們將我們的裁決2024年1月4日前暫緩實施（「州務卿」認證總統初選選票內容的截止日期前一天）。如果在2024年1月4日前在聯邦最高法院審查，則此暫緩將持續不變，且州務卿將得在2024年總統初選選票上包含川普總統名字，直至收到最高法院的任何命令或法令。」
時間已到，根據CNN的報導，最高法院同意決定是否可以禁止川普出任公職。
這是一個司法定得合法介入一個高度政治案件的罕見情況，尤其是考慮到川普在共和黨陣營中的高度支持。
這是我在「臨時意見」裁定後數天構想解決這一死棋的想定：為捍衛美國憲法，美國聯邦最高法院有理由裁定川普不應該在共和黨初選選票上，就像科羅拉多最高法院所做的那樣。與此同時，為了應對和解決跨部門困境的不平衡，正確的方式是拜登同時宣布不參與2024年民主黨初選作結。
這不是胡思亂想，拜登在12月5日一個募款會場的確表示過：「假使川普不選，我也不一定會選，我們不能讓他贏。」
這是一種政治解決方案，使雙方能夠解決跨部門的僵局。為了美國憲法和國家利益，兩位資深政治人物應該同時退休。
