Why didn't I launch my SaaS?

更新 發佈閱讀 15 分鐘
Learning from my failures: "I built something fast, but I didn't become the person who could stand behind it."

It all started 4 months ago, when I went out of control and chose to become unemployed. I gave myself 3 months to find out what I wanted to do going forward (I knew I needed longer but I promised the period because my mom was watching). The change of routine from the regular 9-to-5 to having full control of my time back excited me with a fresh shot of adrenaline; I was open to all the possibilities in the world, and I believed I could be successful.

Everywhere I looked, people were telling me how easy it is to build a SaaS (Software as a Service) with AI now.

Believing in its power and my dedication, I started the journey of software development — after a brief learning session with two videos by SuperSimpleDev on YouTube:

With — You, On Earth.

With — You, On Earth.

Shortly after, I began my first PWA (Progressive Web App) project 'With' —a poetic set of 366 self-reflection prompts, structured as introspective 'Truth' or 'Dare' cue cards, guiding users through a year-long ritual of personal clarity and renewal.

I attempted vanilla coding with my brand new knowledge but quickly turned to AI to speed the process up because what I really cared about was getting something out there to sell.

It didn't sell.

The lack of public interest in the first product had led me to dive into the next project instantly: my first and last SaaS product which I named 'This, Is' — a Notion-powered site builder that turns your Notion content into a customizable, personal web presence. The idea started merely from the desire to have freely moving 'stickers' on my Notion, and to have a platform where people share their lives with data.

This, Is — A Notion-powered link page that acts like a home for visitors.

This, Is — A Notion-powered link page that acts like a home for visitors.

I wanted to make something great, fast — to outrun all reasonable doubts.

By the time I felt comfortable sharing the idea, I had already rushed too far to step back.

The idea didn't hold up when I tried to explain it out loud to my sister. It came out like a bad pitch with 'powered by Notion', 'customizable site', 'sharing lives', 'journaled data'… I couldn't introduce my product in just one sentence. It was like I was trying to convince myself along as I watched her expression change.

By the end of my elaborations, she asked questions that hit exactly where I was uncertain:

'If it's for sites, why not Wix?'

'If it's for sharing, why not Instagram, Threads, or X?'

'If it's by Notion, why not stay Notion?'

A slight dejection felt like a K.O. punch.

I thought I had found a market gap, but I had neither the clarity nor the foundation to stand on. The progress after that felt like walking along a crumbling edge. The realization came too late.

I must admit that I had the urge to quit, but I had also set a stubborn goal to finish it by the end of March (later April).

Uneasily, I continued the project, but reshaping it into a more flexible alternative to Linktree — where, instead of a stack of links, your link page could be presented with more freedom and creativity that could feel more like you.

I updated the copy, kept jumping back and forth between Auth, APIs, Routes, Databases, UI/UX… All through AI. It was all fun and games until the structures grew complex. I spent hours debugging under the instruction of Gemini and ChatGPT like a marionette, too exhausted to ask 'why'.

The more I relied on AI, the less I tried to think for myself.

By the end of March, the product was almost ready so I had started to ask AI about soft-launching it, calculating the suitable price range, things I should've asked before starting the project. As someone who worked in management, I find it hilarious how I disregard the planning stage.

Anyway, this was when I learned about the legal requirements of launching a SaaS product — the need for a business entity, privacy notice and terms, then the business part of it — the cost, revenue, the consideration of churn rate, yada-yada-yada.

These procedures were like the bumps on the road. I sped all the way and then I was suddenly forced to slow down. I was glad that my hesitation, which was growing subconsciously, had driven me to take the pause, it gave me time to reconsider. It went from 'should I do it with a sole proprietorship or a Sendirian Berhad' to 'do I really want this?' — I didn't want to quit midway but I was considering quitting when the prototype was ready?

Notice how it went from a 'product' to a 'prototype'? That was an indicator that I humbled myself when 'This, Is' stopped being a project and started becoming a responsibility. I was so ready to sell but I changed it to the 'waiting list' because it became something I wasn't ready to take responsibility for.

Eventually, here came the moment when I finally admitted that I could build something with AI, quickly, but I didn't become the person who could stand behind it.

AI gave me the speed; it fed my impatience as well as my greed and delusions. The more I relied on AI, the less grounded I felt. Working with AI didn't feel like collaborating with people. It felt like commissioning a custom-made Pandora's box.

People say you should sell what you build.

I think you should only sell what you believe in, and I didn't believe in this enough to launch it.

So, yes, I was suddenly ready to quit. I felt relieved to walk away — not just because it was easy (frankly), but because I knew this wasn't something I was willing to carry forward.

I don't just want to build fast — I want to understand what I'm building.

And that means learning to slow down.


I am sharing my prototypes here, feel free to reach out if you're interested:
https://this-comma-is.vercel.app/
https://with-you-on-earth.vercel.app/

留言
avatar-img
落一晨星 / ON1E
0會員
8內容數
“There is only one star that falls at dawn”—— 在无人察觉的瞬间存在,希望有人刚好抬头看见。
你可能也想看
Thumbnail
本網頁為 iPAS AI 應用規劃師考試提供考前重點摘要,專注於雲端服務架構的對比分析。
Thumbnail
本網頁為 iPAS AI 應用規劃師考試提供考前重點摘要,專注於雲端服務架構的對比分析。
Thumbnail
What LLM Optimization (LLMO) is, why it’s critical for brand visibility in AI-driven search, and three core pillars of LLMO with practical strategies.
Thumbnail
What LLM Optimization (LLMO) is, why it’s critical for brand visibility in AI-driven search, and three core pillars of LLMO with practical strategies.
Thumbnail
本文深度解析賽勒布倫尼科夫的舞臺作品《傳奇:帕拉贊諾夫的十段殘篇》,如何以十段殘篇,結合帕拉贊諾夫的電影美學、象徵意象與當代政治流亡抗爭,探討藝術在儀式消失的現代社會如何承接意義,並展現不羈的自由靈魂。
Thumbnail
本文深度解析賽勒布倫尼科夫的舞臺作品《傳奇:帕拉贊諾夫的十段殘篇》,如何以十段殘篇,結合帕拉贊諾夫的電影美學、象徵意象與當代政治流亡抗爭,探討藝術在儀式消失的現代社會如何承接意義,並展現不羈的自由靈魂。
Thumbnail
chatgpt對話練習(網站製作基礎)
Thumbnail
chatgpt對話練習(網站製作基礎)
Thumbnail
What Micro SaaS is, how it differs from traditional SaaS, how to build one from scratch, and the most promising Micro SaaS opportunities.
Thumbnail
What Micro SaaS is, how it differs from traditional SaaS, how to build one from scratch, and the most promising Micro SaaS opportunities.
Thumbnail
長期以來,西方美學以《維特魯威人》式的幾何比例定義「完美身體」,這種視覺標準無形中成為殖民擴張與種族分類的暴力工具。本文透過分析奈及利亞編舞家庫德斯.奧尼奎庫的舞作《轉轉生》,探討當代非洲舞蹈如何跳脫「標本式」的文化觀看。
Thumbnail
長期以來,西方美學以《維特魯威人》式的幾何比例定義「完美身體」,這種視覺標準無形中成為殖民擴張與種族分類的暴力工具。本文透過分析奈及利亞編舞家庫德斯.奧尼奎庫的舞作《轉轉生》,探討當代非洲舞蹈如何跳脫「標本式」的文化觀看。
Thumbnail
全新版本的《三便士歌劇》如何不落入「復刻經典」的巢臼,反而利用華麗的秀場視覺,引導觀眾在晚期資本主義的消費愉悅之中,而能驚覺「批判」本身亦可能被收編——而當絞繩升起,這場關於如何生存的黑色遊戲,又將帶領新時代的我們走向何種後現代的自我解構?
Thumbnail
全新版本的《三便士歌劇》如何不落入「復刻經典」的巢臼,反而利用華麗的秀場視覺,引導觀眾在晚期資本主義的消費愉悅之中,而能驚覺「批判」本身亦可能被收編——而當絞繩升起,這場關於如何生存的黑色遊戲,又將帶領新時代的我們走向何種後現代的自我解構?
Thumbnail
若說易卜生的《玩偶之家》為 19 世紀的女性,開啟了一扇離家的窄門,那麼《海妲.蓋柏樂》展現的便是門後的窒息世界。本篇文章由劇場演員 Amily 執筆,同為熟稔文本的演員,亦是深刻體察制度縫隙的當代女性,此文所看見的不僅僅是崩壞前夕的最後發聲,更是女人被迫置於冷酷的制度之下,步步陷入無以言說的困境。
Thumbnail
若說易卜生的《玩偶之家》為 19 世紀的女性,開啟了一扇離家的窄門,那麼《海妲.蓋柏樂》展現的便是門後的窒息世界。本篇文章由劇場演員 Amily 執筆,同為熟稔文本的演員,亦是深刻體察制度縫隙的當代女性,此文所看見的不僅僅是崩壞前夕的最後發聲,更是女人被迫置於冷酷的制度之下,步步陷入無以言說的困境。
追蹤感興趣的內容從 Google News 追蹤更多 vocus 的最新精選內容追蹤 Google News